<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Master for Webs &#187; J.Crew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://master4webs.com/tag/jcrew/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://master4webs.com</link>
	<description>All tools for web masters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Can Buying Khakis Be This Complicated?</title>
		<link>http://master4webs.com/how-can-buying-khakis-be-this-complicated.html</link>
		<comments>http://master4webs.com/how-can-buying-khakis-be-this-complicated.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banana Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooks Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.Crew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.L. Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polo']]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://master4webs.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTML clipboardHow can something as simple as chinos be so complicated to buy? Khaki trousers, after all, are supposed to be the fashion world&#8217;s answer to vanilla ice cream. Same color and consistency no matter what the brand. Always cool in the summertime. And usually a lot less memorable than the toppings. Like blue jeans, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTML clipboardHow can something as simple as chinos be so complicated to buy? Khaki  trousers, after all, are supposed to be the fashion world&#8217;s answer to vanilla  ice cream. Same color and consistency no matter what the brand. Always cool in  the summertime. And usually a lot less memorable than the toppings.</p>
<p>Like blue jeans, chinos are a classic &#8212; with a lineage that stretches from  British soldiers in colonial India to John F. Kennedy and just about every frat  brother in creation. Chinos&#8217; longevity is a testament to the power of simple  ideas: Wear them to work or wear them to run with the bulls in Pamplona and  nobody will hassle you.</p>
<p>So leave it to the likes of <a href="http://bananarepublic.gap.com/">Banana Republic</a> and <a href="http://www.llbean.com/">L.L.  Bean</a> to give the noble chino an identity crisis. Think you know what color  khaki is? The pants we ordered turned out to be anything from off-white to light  coffee. To confuse matters, Web sites offered us alternative shades like  &#8220;British khaki,&#8221; &#8220;dark&#8221; and the enigmatic &#8220;new khaki.&#8221;</p>
<p>Adding to our confusion was the question of style and cut. On its Web site, <a href="http://www.brooksbrothers.com/">Brooks Brothers</a> offers four types of twill for its chinos, ranging from  &#8220;stretch&#8221; to something called &#8220;enzyme washed&#8221; with little explanation of why  you&#8217;d choose one over the other. <a href="http://www.jcrew.com/">J.Crew</a> offers four cuts of chinos, though its Web site explains just how they&#8217;re  supposed to fit and what kind of mood they&#8217;re meant to evoke.</p>
<p>To keep things simple, we ordered the most basic chino each catalog site  offered. We picked a classic model with pleats and cuffs (when possible) and  went for the color that&#8217;s labeled, or most closely resembles, khaki. And we  ordered each in the same size 34.</p>
<p>But when the pants arrived, something grabbed us: Almost every pair was  either too tight, too baggy or too long. Banana Republic&#8217;s chino was tight-waisted  with nearly two extra inches on the inseam. The best fit came from L.L. Bean,  which isn&#8217;t surprising since its site allows you to download a measuring tape.</p>
<p>How do you test a pair of chinos? We gave them a tumble in the washer, loaded  up the pockets and took a very spoiled dachshund for five Sunday walks. We wore  each pair for a stretch at the office with a jacket and tie, too. This led us to  the following chino doctrine: Wash first, judge later. To our amazement, all of  the pants that were too long shrunk to an acceptable range. The laundry also  revealed a lot about fabric: Our stonewashed J.Crew pants came out wrinkly,  while the Banana Republic pair seemed to take a firmer shape.</p>
<p>Two pairs seemed like candidates for early retirement. Our Brooks Brothers  entry left us sore even before we tried them on &#8212; the overnight shipping charge  was a whopping $21 &#8212; and we never ended up warming to them. Nice engineering  touches like a reinforced leg seam didn&#8217;t keep these chinos from looking lumpy  and uninspired. J.Crew&#8217;s roomy pants didn&#8217;t shrink at all in the wash, but came  out feeling floppy.</p>
<p>We had a tough time deciding between our two finalists, <a href="http://www.polo.com/">Polo</a>&#8216;s  Andrew Pant and Banana Republic&#8217;s Smithfield Chino. The Polos overcame some long  odds out of the box: Until we washed them, their deep pleats made them look like  parachute pants. We loved Polo&#8217;s coffee color and superior cotton, and they won  the coat-and-tie competition hands down.</p>
<p>The Banana Republic chinos felt durable, with two front buttons and a  reinforced waistband. Shallow pleats and pocket flaps gave them a modern look.  One problem: Our 34&#8242;s were disco tight. But for $8 less than the Polos, we&#8217;ll  happily order a bigger size, and name these our Best Overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://master4webs.com/how-can-buying-khakis-be-this-complicated.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

